(Book) Catholics Can Support The RH Bill in Good Conscience

(Position paper on the Reproductive Health Billby individual faculty of the Ateneo de Manila University)

(Note: The opinions expressed in this paper are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of other faculty. Neither do they represent the official position of the Ateneo de Manila University nor the Society of Jesus.)

We, individual faculty of the Ateneo de Manila University, call for the immediatepassage of House Bill 5043 on “Reproductive Health and Population Development” (hereafterRH Bill) in Congress. After examining it in the light of Philippine social realities, and informedby our Christian faith, we have reached the conclusion that our country urgently needs acomprehensive and integrated policy on reproductive health and population development, asprovided by the RH Bill. We also believe that the provisions of the bill adhere to core principlesof Catholic social teaching: the sanctity of human life, the dignity of the human person, thepreferential option for the poor and vulnerable, integral human development, human rights, andthe primacy of conscience.

Catholic social theology since Vatican II has evolved, on the one hand, from theemphasis on order, social cohesiveness, the acceptance of some inequality, and obedience to authority ― to the recognition, on the other, of the centrality of the human person, and theconcomitant need for human freedom, equality, and participation (Pacem in Terris 1963, Octogesima Adveniens 1971). In the same way that Vatican II was a council for aggiornamento (renewal) for the universal Church, so too did the 1991 Second Plenary Council of thePhilippines (PCP-II) aim at the renewal of the Church in the Philippines. After a month of collectively studying and praying to discern the “signs of the times,” PCP-II declared: “As weapproach the year 2000, Christ bids this community ― ourselves, the laity, religious and clergy of the Catholic Church in the Philippines ― to be a Church of the Poor” (PCP-II Acts, no. 96).

As Catholics and Filipinos, we share the hope and mission of building a Church of thePoor. We are thus deeply disturbed and saddened by calls made by some members of theCatholic Church to reject a proposed legislation that promises to improve the wellbeing of Filipino families, especially the lives of women, children, adolescents, and the poor. Being a“Church of the Poor” urges us to be with and listen to the poor, so that their “joys and hopes…griefs and anxieties” become ours as well (Gaudium et Spes 1965, no. 1). We therefore ask thosewho denounce the RH Bill as “pro-abortion,” “anti-life,” “anti-women,” “anti-poor,” and“immoral” to consider the economic and social conditions of our people, as borne out byempirical evidence, and to recognize that the bill is, in fact, “pro-life,” “pro-women,” and “pro-poor.”

(Click on the link below to view and/or download the whole book)

Source: http://www.scribd.com/doc/7545622/ADMUPosition-Paper-on-the-Reproductive-Health-and-Population-DevelopmentActOctober-2008

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: